March 28, 2015 3 Comments
Grahame in a list of interoperability geeks.
Thoughts and comments on the emerging HL7 FHIR standard, from a FHIR Evangelist
March 24, 2015 2 Comments
So now that we’ve established how we intend to build our model from HL7 v2 messages, let’s turn our attention to architectural issues. We’ll need to look at how FHIR thinks about managing messages – both in terms of the structure and content of a FHIR message, and also how the server should process those messages.
March 23, 2015 Leave a comment
(I particularly liked the bus…)
March 23, 2015 6 Comments
In the last post, we started to think about how we might be able to capture clinically useful information (naturally as FHIR resources) from the HL7 v2 messages that are used within many hospitals. These messages are used to move information between the various components of a hospital such as the PAS (Patient Administration System), the RIS (Radiology Information System), the LIS (Laboratory Information System) and so forth.
A common pattern is that the ‘downstream’ systems (LIS, RIS) ‘subscribe’ to these messages emitted from the PAS – generally via an Integration Engine. So all we’ll do is add ourselves to the list of interested parties, and we’ll get a copy of each message as well.
And actually, there’s no real reason why we should confine our attentions to just one hospital – if there are multiple co-operating hospitals then there’s no reason why we can’t receive messages from all of them, though we do need to be careful with identifiers (patient and visit) as these might overlap between providers.
March 20, 2015 1 Comment
For those who don’t mind snow (though I’m told that by April 29 – the connectathon date – the snow has mostly gone).
Here’s the link to the registration site.
There doesn’t appear to be a website (yet) though there are details in a PDF that you can get from the organizers I’m sure. The tracks are listed as:
BTW – Lloyd did offer to arrange for snow if I came, but alas…
March 19, 2015 2 Comments
FHIR resources (and bundles) have always had metadata (ID, version, tags etc), but in DSTU-1 they were external to the resource, while in the DSTU-2 candidate they are within the resource (a not uncontroversial move). This post from Furore (one of the earliest supporters of FHIR) talks about some of changes that are coming…
Oh – any by the way, just looking at the picture that’s on the front page (at the moment) of the furore site, I’m so jealous that I wasn’t at the 2014 Amsterdam DevDays – I don’t suppose you could photoshop me in there?